Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. ASI Community
  3. SSDC Collection
  4. Gaia FGK benchmark stars new candidates at low metallicities
 
  • Details

Gaia FGK benchmark stars new candidates at low metallicities

Author(s)
Hawkins, K.
Jofr, P.
Heiter, U.
Pancino, Elena  
Subjects

stars fundamental par...

techniques spectrosc...

standards

Date Issued
2016-07-01
Mission(s)
Other
Abstract
Context. We have entered an era of large spectroscopic surveys in which we can measure, through automated pipelines, the atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances for large numbers of stars. Calibrating these survey pipelines using a set of "benchmark stars" in order to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the provided parameters and abundances is of utmost importance. The recent proposed set of Gaia FGK benchmark stars has up to five metal-poor stars but no recommended stars within -2.0 < [Fe/H] < -1.0 dex. However, this metallicity regime is critical to calibrate properly. <BR /> Aims In this paper, we aim to add candidate Gaia benchmark stars inside of this metal-poor gap. We began with a sample of 21 metal-poor stars which was reduced to 10 stars by requiring accurate photometry and parallaxes, and high-resolution archival spectra. <BR /> Methods The procedure used to determine the stellar parameters was similar to the previous works in this series for consistency. The difference was to homogeneously determine the angular diameter and effective temperature (T<SUB>eff</SUB>) of all of our stars using the Infrared Flux Method utilizing multi-band photometry. The surface gravity (log g) was determined through fitting stellar evolutionary tracks. The [Fe/H] was determined using four different spectroscopic methods fixing the T<SUB>eff</SUB> and log g from the values determined independent of spectroscopy. <BR /> Results We discuss, star-by-star, the quality of each parameter including how it compares to literature, how it compares to a spectroscopic run where all parameters are free, and whether Fe i ionisation-excitation balance is achieved. <BR /> Conclusions From the 10 stars, we recommend a sample of five new metal-poor benchmark candidate stars which have consistent T<SUB>eff</SUB>, log g, and [Fe/H] determined through several means. These stars, which are within -1.3 < [Fe/H] < -1.0, can be used for calibration and validation purpose of stellar parameter and abundance pipelines and should be of highest priority for future interferometric studies. Based on data obtained from the ESO Science Archive Facility under request number pdjofre132105.Full Appendix tables are only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to <A href="http //cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr">http //cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr</A> (<A href="http //130.79.128.5">http //130.79.128.5</A>) or via <A href="http //cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/592/A70">http //cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/592/A70</A>
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13025/4525
DOI
10.1051/0004-6361/201628268
URL
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...592A..70H
Explore by
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback