Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. ASI Community
  3. ASI Multidisciplinary Collection
  4. Low doses of cisplatin or gemcitabine plus Photofrin/photodynamic therapy: Disjointed cell cycle phase-related activity accounts for synergistic outcome in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer cells (H1299).
 
  • Details

Low doses of cisplatin or gemcitabine plus Photofrin/photodynamic therapy: Disjointed cell cycle phase-related activity accounts for synergistic outcome in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer cells (H1299).

Author(s)
ASI Sponsor
Crescenzi, Elvira
Chiaviello, Angela
Canti, Gianfranco
Subjects

Antineoplastic Agents...

Antineoplastic Agents...

Antineoplastic Combin...

Antineoplastic Combin...

Carcinoma

Cisplatin

Cisplatin: therapeuti...

Deoxycytidine

Deoxycytidine: analog...

Deoxycytidine: therap...

Dihematoporphyrin Eth...

Dihematoporphyrin Eth...

Dose-Response Relatio...

Drug

G0 Phase

G0 Phase: drug effect...

G1 Phase

G1 Phase: drug effect...

Humans

Lung Neoplasms

Lung Neoplasms: drug ...

Lung Neoplasms: patho...

Non-Small-Cell Lung

Non-Small-Cell Lung: ...

Non-Small-Cell Lung: ...

Photochemotherapy

Photosensitizing Agen...

Photosensitizing Agen...

Date Issued
2006-03-01
Abstract
We compared the effects of monotherapy (photodynamic therapy or chemotherapy) versus combination therapy (photodynamic therapy plus a specific drug) on the non-small cell lung cancer cell line H1299. Our aim was to evaluate whether the additive/synergistic effects of combination treatment were such that the cytostatic dose could be reduced without affecting treatment efficacy. Photodynamic therapy was done by irradiating Photofrin-preloaded H1299 p53/p16-null cells with a halogen lamp equipped with a bandpass filter. The cytotoxic drugs used were cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum [II] (CDDP or cisplatin) and 2,2-difluoro-2-deoxycytidine (gemcitabine). Various treatment combinations yielded therapeutic effects (trypan blue dye exclusion test) ranging from additive to clearly synergistic, the most effective being a combination of photodynamic therapy and CDDP. To gain insight into the cellular response mechanisms underlying favorable outcomes, we analyzed the H1299 cell cycle profiles and the expression patterns of several key proteins after monotherapy. In our conditions, we found that photodynamic therapy with Photofrin targeted G0-G1 cells, thereby causing cells to accumulate in S phase. In contrast, low-dose CDDP killed cells in S phase, thereby causing an accumulation of G0-G1 cells (and increased p21 expression). Like photodynamic therapy, low-dose gemcitabine targeted G0-G1 cells, which caused a massive accumulation of cells in S phase (and increased cyclin A expression). Although we observed therapeutic reinforcement with both drugs and photodynamic therapy, reinforcement was more pronounced when the drug (CDDP) and photodynamic therapy exert disjointed phase-related cytotoxic activity. Thus, if photodynamic therapy is appropriately tuned, the dose of the cytostatic drug can be reduced without compromising the therapeutic response.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13025/1804
ISSN
1535-7163
Journal
Molecular cancer therapeutics
URL
http://mct.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/5/3/776
Explore by
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback