Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • English
  • Italiano
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. ASI Community
  3. SSDC Collection
  4. Mass and metallicity scaling relations of high-redshift star-forming galaxies selected by GRBs
 
  • Details

Mass and metallicity scaling relations of high-redshift star-forming galaxies selected by GRBs

Author(s)
Arabsalmani, M.
Møller, P.
Perley, D. A.
Freudling, W.
Fynbo, J. P. U.
more
Subjects

gamma-ray burst: gene...

galaxies: evolution

galaxies: high-redshi...

galaxies: ISM

galaxies: kinematics ...

galaxies: star format...

Date Issued
2018-01-01
Mission(s)
Other
Abstract
We present a comprehensive study of the relations between gas kinematics, metallicity and stellar mass in a sample of 82 gamma-ray burst (GRB)-selected galaxies using absorption and emission methods. We find the velocity widths of both emission and absorption profiles to be a proxy of stellar mass. We also investigate the velocity-metallicity correlation and its evolution with redshift. Using 33 GRB hosts with measured stellar mass and metallicity, we study the mass-metallicity relation for GRB host galaxies in a stellar mass range of 10^8.2-10^11.1 M⊙ and a redshift range of z ~ 0.3-3.4. The GRB-selected galaxies appear to track the mass-metallicity relation of star-forming galaxies but with an offset of 0.15 towards lower metallicities. This offset is comparable with the average error bar on the metallicity measurements of the GRB sample and also the scatter on the mass-metallicity relation of the general population. It is hard to decide whether this relatively small offset is due to systematic effects or the intrinsic nature of GRB hosts. We also investigate the possibility of using absorption-line metallicity measurements of GRB hosts to study the mass-metallicity relation at high redshifts. Our analysis shows that the metallicity measurements from absorption methods can significantly differ from emission metallicities and assuming identical measurements from the two methods may result in erroneous conclusions.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13025/5588
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stx2451
URL
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473.3312A
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/473/3/3312/4222621
Explore by
  • Communities & Collections
  • Research Outputs

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback